Blue sky and shadows and deception

 

Report: #0145  

From something as common as a blue sky and clouds that produce shadows on Earth's surface, an anomaly is created. In this brief report, I don't want to show an anomaly but simply a beautiful landscape. The only thing we must not forget is that most of the images I analyze are from Mars. If someone was preparing for a walk through an earthly desert, they are disappointed now. Or rather, they have caught a cold, because what seems like an earthly desert is also a desert, but a cold one and a bit far from here.  

In reality, it is not so far away nor so different. Possibly, Mars is more like what we imagine. Why do we picture something very different?

Simply because of propaganda, which gives us a wrong image. I compare it to the advertising of a laundry detergent. Thirty years ago, a product was promoted that would revolutionize washing, promising to leave clothes white. Thirty years have passed, and today they say the same thing. How bad that product from thirty years ago must have been if now, with a "new formula" from the same company, they promise the same: to leave clothes white. 

Propaganda lies even in the smallest details: the music, the surprised and happy faces, the colors. Examples are images of paradisiacal beaches or towns among mountains in Switzerland. Though no one questions their beauty, nature is not so generous with sunny days and often envelops everything in mist. Advertising photos do not show the days of waiting for models and photographers to avoid the mist or rain, nor the mosquitoes attacking, nor the trash or broken glass in the sand. 

Why do I talk so much about propaganda? Because NASA and astronomers impose on us a preconceived idea of what the universe should be like.

Isn't it ridiculous that from the Mars rovers, Mars satellites, and even the Moon, hundreds of thousands of images arrive, but all in black and white? Yes, they say it's to save energy and memory. Wouldn't it be better to send half the images, but in color and with optimal quality?  

Little by little, we have become accustomed to these black-and-white photos. If we suddenly saw an interplanetary image in color, I bet we would feel negative emotions toward the image and the one showing it. The first thing we would say is: "This is fake." "The one showing it wants to deceive us." "It's a forger." "Who does he think he is?" "How bad the colors are; that place never looks like that, not even in dreams." "It's not serious; another one who wants to play with us." Showing an image in color is like doing propaganda for the devil. My bet is a free walk through Mars via my Ovni-Digiart blog or the other in English, Mars and UFOs Mysteries.  

http://ovnidigiart.blogspot.com/ 

http://marsandufosmysteries.blogspot.com/

 

Correct, these photos are not original. They are fake, but not a deception, because I warn you that they are images corrected in color by me. 

In my defense, I do the most logical thing: I show an image as I imagine Mars could be. I still retain a small part of my brain that is not saturated by propaganda—the creative part that every human being has at their disposal. Imagination is something very particular to humans.  

All my life, I have wondered what the truth behind creation would be like. What would the beings and animals of other worlds look like?

It never occurred to me that everything would be in black and white. The spectrum of the Sun's rays—and of any star in the universe—contains variations in frequencies. Those frequencies are there, no matter what senses nature develops in its evolution. They can be eyes with all their complexity or simply cells, like our skin, which does not see the Sun but feels a part of that frequency and translates it into heat. Other frequencies, or other senses, can perceive vibrations or the heat reflected from living beings or hot objects.

I believe I have said enough to understand that seeing and showing images in color is not an anomaly.

Showing the opposite for 30 years—that is an anomaly, a lie, and a deception. 

Dear readers, these images show a beautiful play of light and shadows. In a brief lapse between the different images taken on the same day (Sol 2228), you can observe how a part of Mars's surface darkens.

The right part of the images is completely in shadow, and only a strip in the center remains illuminated.

This means something very normal, and if it weren't for the misleading information, we would never talk about it. A cloud moves across the sky of Mars and, in its passage, momentarily blocks the Sun's rays.

That's how simple it is! Clouds in a blue sky move and play with their companion, light, and its shadow. A blue sky, light and shadow, perfected with sand—all on Mars.  One detail, but very important, further supports my suspicion that the sky has the same color we are accustomed to.

On a part of the Mars rover Opportunity, the sky is reflected, and if I'm not mistaken, I can see spots or pixels with a blue tone.  

The deception of NASA is nothing more than the propaganda of laundry detergents. Clothes cannot be more than white—or rather, clean, because not all fabrics are white (since humans exist, there are colors in all their utensils and garments).

Nature is a product of solar rays and contains parts of its frequencies within. The evolution of each species chooses the most suitable frequency in the place of its origin.

Josef Bauer 

Source:

Source: http://marsrover.nasa.gov/gallery/all/opportunity_n2228.html