Report: #0191 – Part I
Apollo 17:
An astronaut threw away his oxygen tank. Could he breathe without it?
Anomalies
in the Apollo 17 flight to the Moon
Reflection
on the flight and the politics of lies.
The Apollo 17 flight to the Moon: December 7–19, 1972
The vehicle
that landed on the Moon is called the Lunar Module (LM) "Challenger."
The
astronauts on this mission were Eugene A. Cernan as commander, and Harrison H.
Schmitt as the pilot of the Lunar Lander Module. The third, Ronald E. Evans,
stayed in the orbiter CSM vehicle.
Today, I present a detail never before seen in any report on Apollo
program curiosities.
As you
know, this NASA program with its flights to the Moon—from Apollo 204 or 1 to
Apollo 20—with human landings on the Moon by astronauts. Much is said: yes or
no, did they go or not, did they land or not, or was it all a movie studio
montage? There is as much against as for. I dare not lean to one side. When I
am convinced, I find something that makes me think again.
Recently,
the Japanese probe "Selene" showed images of the Apollo 17 landing
site. I wrote a report to show such an image. I was convinced of the
confirmation. Then I thought: Why isn't a part of one of the vehicles or
remnants of the instruments used and left there visible? Erosion or oxidation
of the equipment is impossible. First, because of the material used, and
second, due to the lack of moisture, wind, cold.
The three
factors that cause erosion and can break or make materials disappear do not
exist there.
The irons
used in the Lander were copper, aluminum. Made of lightweight but hard
materials. The legs are covered with materials that have gold. Why isn't it
seen?
The flag is
not cheap material. The lunar rover may have lost air in its tires, but the
rubber must still be there. The parabolic antennas do not evaporate. But
nothing of nothing is seen. Only a comparison of the mountains. Today, I
already fear that even the mountains were made with Photoshop. A mountain fall
is so linear, the curves so elegant as a child would paint them. The horizon
makes an inexplicable cut. From one line to the other, the horizon begins,
already unreachable for the cameras.
In my youth
and all my life, having a Hasselblad camera was my dream. And I'll die before
having one. They are expensive and the most professional that exists. Today, an
image has more than 30 MB. Before, they had a 6x6 cm film, not like the common
3x4, and each negative was numbered and unique.
When I was
young, I sent images to an editor for publication.
They
rejected me because the image couldn't be enlarged with the resolution I had.
If it's not a Hasselblad, we can't use it in books or posters, they
replied. Returning to NASA, they used a
Hasselblad with a 500mm lens, and we can't see the horizon clear and sharp.
Sometimes not even at fifty meters. Something doesn't match. Now I believe—and
I can correct myself when new data makes me change my opinion—that truth and
lies are half right. They went but made many tricks. Possibly they traveled,
but did not land. They did orbits around the Moon. That would already be a
great achievement.
If they
landed—and there are also many evidences that they did—then they hide some
technology used to get there and leave again. Truth is not certain, and the lie
is inflated.
Truth is
lie, and what is certain is lied about or denied. It is difficult to understand
with common sense. I believe the part of military secrets influences a lot.
Today, they are using technology we can't even dream of. Alongside that—and
parallel—we use and let evolve our airplanes and rockets, though having
different technology.
The same
happens with cars. A common car has more than two thousand parts. An electric
car has two hundred. That's why there is so much work in automobile factories.
But is it more important to work just to work, or to stop manufacturing
unnecessary parts and use the free labor and surplus resources for a new use
that arises from these new technologies? It's a schizophrenic world.
GM causes
so many losses and they won't let a company like that die. Why don't they use
this money to push a new industry of solar energy and electric cars? With
wheels without rubber. Let's leave
things there. It's not the place for that, but to understand the lies, one must
observe politics, which never changes.
Report #0191 – Part 2
The
evidences of lies on the Moon.
I show two
examples of non-matches.
In this
case, I speak of only two, out of the hundreds there are. But I don't line up
behind and don't repeat something others have already explained much better
than me.
Of these
two evidences, I have never heard, so I explain them. After the presence on the Moon, the two
astronauts climb into the lunar module, which in a few minutes would be ejected
into the air toward the Moon's orbit, where the other vehicle waits to take the
three astronauts back to Earth.
One
astronaut already entered the upper part of this module. The lower part would
stay on the Moon and serve as a launch platform. In a few minutes, very
powerful explosives would push the module toward orbit. Once floating, they
would ignite the auxiliary rockets on the side of this module. It seems
escaping gravity is not so difficult on the Moon.
As I said, one already entered completely
where he came out when they arrived.
The other
had the idea to leave his air tank that he had on his back, to reduce the
weight of the module. Good idea, it seems. Why didn't the other do it too?
The one
threw his fresh air equipment from above and entered the module. Or was it
different? To remove the hoses, belts, cables, you need help from someone.
Well, then it was done on Earth or better on the Moon's ground.
One must
think of one thing. They are like divers in the sea. Without their air
equipment and air renewer, they have one minute to breathe, and then they die
suffocated.
But one
just takes off his equipment like that, spins it on the ground because coming
off his back, the NASA symbol would be down, but it wouldn't be so nice to take
a photo without this symbol of power, and sends it up with full speed.
Although
with low gravity, it won't be easy to climb this ladder without steps more than
a meter high. Did they jump upward?
Climbing
the ladder, entering through this small tunnel, and waiting for his comrade to
come and enter too. To be able to close the hatch, start the engine, and open a
valve that fills the cabin with air. What happens if the companion discovers
something and checks once more before climbing the module? The other has the
air he holds in his lungs already for almost forty seconds; what happens if the
one below takes a few more photos? Because right now, Earth looks so tender
again, and it will be the last from here. What will it be...?
No, his
companion came in time. Because they arrived alive on Earth.
Did this
module have two cameras or just one? I don't know. I only know that in this
camera, they took off their super-dirty suits and sat more comfortably in the
command cabin to launch.
The
astronauts' suits in the module before launching from the Moon.
After
docking with the lunar orbiter, this module undocked again and surely crashed
on the Moon and stayed there.
AS17-134-20524HR
Soon, they
would dock with the CSM transport vehicle. How do they enter this vehicle?
Through the tip where they dock. Probably.
But
returning to the Moon.
It is
impossible to take off the air equipment there. Never! I don't know what that
means. I have no answer, because a diver doesn't dare throw away his air at the
bottom of the sea and ascend without it.
The oxygen
tank thrown on the Moon's surface.
Continue ...
Josef Bauer
Source: Image I / NASA AS17-145-22196HR (the pic. with the Oxygen tank)
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a17/AS17-145-22196HR.jpg
Source: Image II / NASA (the pic. Climbing the stairs)
Source: Image III / NASA AS17-134-20524HR (super dirty suits)
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a17/AS17-134-20524HR.jpg
Source: Image IV / NASA (entering through this small tunnel)
