Moon Anomalies: Apollo 17 – Oxygen Container

Report: #0191 – Part I

Apollo 17: An astronaut threw away his oxygen tank. Could he breathe without it?

Anomalies in the Apollo 17 flight to the Moon

Reflection on the flight and the politics of lies.  The Apollo 17 flight to the Moon: December 7–19, 1972

The vehicle that landed on the Moon is called the Lunar Module (LM) "Challenger."

The astronauts on this mission were Eugene A. Cernan as commander, and Harrison H. Schmitt as the pilot of the Lunar Lander Module. The third, Ronald E. Evans, stayed in the orbiter CSM vehicle.  Today, I present a detail never before seen in any report on Apollo program curiosities.

As you know, this NASA program with its flights to the Moon—from Apollo 204 or 1 to Apollo 20—with human landings on the Moon by astronauts. Much is said: yes or no, did they go or not, did they land or not, or was it all a movie studio montage? There is as much against as for. I dare not lean to one side. When I am convinced, I find something that makes me think again. 

Recently, the Japanese probe "Selene" showed images of the Apollo 17 landing site. I wrote a report to show such an image. I was convinced of the confirmation. Then I thought: Why isn't a part of one of the vehicles or remnants of the instruments used and left there visible? Erosion or oxidation of the equipment is impossible. First, because of the material used, and second, due to the lack of moisture, wind, cold.

The three factors that cause erosion and can break or make materials disappear do not exist there.

The irons used in the Lander were copper, aluminum. Made of lightweight but hard materials. The legs are covered with materials that have gold. Why isn't it seen? 

The flag is not cheap material. The lunar rover may have lost air in its tires, but the rubber must still be there. The parabolic antennas do not evaporate. But nothing of nothing is seen. Only a comparison of the mountains. Today, I already fear that even the mountains were made with Photoshop. A mountain fall is so linear, the curves so elegant as a child would paint them. The horizon makes an inexplicable cut. From one line to the other, the horizon begins, already unreachable for the cameras.

In my youth and all my life, having a Hasselblad camera was my dream. And I'll die before having one. They are expensive and the most professional that exists. Today, an image has more than 30 MB. Before, they had a 6x6 cm film, not like the common 3x4, and each negative was numbered and unique.

When I was young, I sent images to an editor for publication.

They rejected me because the image couldn't be enlarged with the resolution I had. If it's not a Hasselblad, we can't use it in books or posters, they replied.  Returning to NASA, they used a Hasselblad with a 500mm lens, and we can't see the horizon clear and sharp. Sometimes not even at fifty meters. Something doesn't match. Now I believe—and I can correct myself when new data makes me change my opinion—that truth and lies are half right. They went but made many tricks. Possibly they traveled, but did not land. They did orbits around the Moon. That would already be a great achievement.

If they landed—and there are also many evidences that they did—then they hide some technology used to get there and leave again. Truth is not certain, and the lie is inflated.

Truth is lie, and what is certain is lied about or denied. It is difficult to understand with common sense. I believe the part of military secrets influences a lot. Today, they are using technology we can't even dream of. Alongside that—and parallel—we use and let evolve our airplanes and rockets, though having different technology. 

The same happens with cars. A common car has more than two thousand parts. An electric car has two hundred. That's why there is so much work in automobile factories. But is it more important to work just to work, or to stop manufacturing unnecessary parts and use the free labor and surplus resources for a new use that arises from these new technologies? It's a schizophrenic world. 

GM causes so many losses and they won't let a company like that die. Why don't they use this money to push a new industry of solar energy and electric cars? With wheels without rubber.  Let's leave things there. It's not the place for that, but to understand the lies, one must observe politics, which never changes. 

Report #0191 – Part 2

The evidences of lies on the Moon.

I show two examples of non-matches.

In this case, I speak of only two, out of the hundreds there are. But I don't line up behind and don't repeat something others have already explained much better than me.

Of these two evidences, I have never heard, so I explain them.  After the presence on the Moon, the two astronauts climb into the lunar module, which in a few minutes would be ejected into the air toward the Moon's orbit, where the other vehicle waits to take the three astronauts back to Earth.

One astronaut already entered the upper part of this module. The lower part would stay on the Moon and serve as a launch platform. In a few minutes, very powerful explosives would push the module toward orbit. Once floating, they would ignite the auxiliary rockets on the side of this module. It seems escaping gravity is not so difficult on the Moon.

 As I said, one already entered completely where he came out when they arrived.

The other had the idea to leave his air tank that he had on his back, to reduce the weight of the module. Good idea, it seems. Why didn't the other do it too?

The one threw his fresh air equipment from above and entered the module. Or was it different? To remove the hoses, belts, cables, you need help from someone. Well, then it was done on Earth or better on the Moon's ground. 

One must think of one thing. They are like divers in the sea. Without their air equipment and air renewer, they have one minute to breathe, and then they die suffocated.

But one just takes off his equipment like that, spins it on the ground because coming off his back, the NASA symbol would be down, but it wouldn't be so nice to take a photo without this symbol of power, and sends it up with full speed.

Although with low gravity, it won't be easy to climb this ladder without steps more than a meter high. Did they jump upward?  

 

Climbing the ladder, entering through this small tunnel, and waiting for his comrade to come and enter too. To be able to close the hatch, start the engine, and open a valve that fills the cabin with air. What happens if the companion discovers something and checks once more before climbing the module? The other has the air he holds in his lungs already for almost forty seconds; what happens if the one below takes a few more photos? Because right now, Earth looks so tender again, and it will be the last from here. What will it be...?

No, his companion came in time. Because they arrived alive on Earth. 

Did this module have two cameras or just one? I don't know. I only know that in this camera, they took off their super-dirty suits and sat more comfortably in the command cabin to launch. 

The astronauts' suits in the module before launching from the Moon.

After docking with the lunar orbiter, this module undocked again and surely crashed on the Moon and stayed there.

AS17-134-20524HR

Soon, they would dock with the CSM transport vehicle. How do they enter this vehicle? Through the tip where they dock. Probably.

But returning to the Moon.

It is impossible to take off the air equipment there. Never! I don't know what that means. I have no answer, because a diver doesn't dare throw away his air at the bottom of the sea and ascend without it.  

The oxygen tank thrown on the Moon's surface.  

Continue ...

Josef Bauer

Source: Image I / NASA AS17-145-22196HR (the pic. with the Oxygen tank)

http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a17/AS17-145-22196HR.jpg

Source: Image II / NASA  (the pic. Climbing the stairs)

Source: Image III / NASA AS17-134-20524HR (super dirty suits)

http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a17/AS17-134-20524HR.jpg

Source: Image IV / NASA  (entering through this small tunnel)