Evidence highlights

Friday, September 4, 2009

The Unknown Is an Inspiration


Reflection: #002

Do not be afraid of something unknown, something you are not yet familiar with at all.

It is not what is strange to you that you should fear. But you must be careful of strangers. 

Alien spaceships are technologically advanced artifacts, and their crew members are scientists. They are fathers who, because of their travels, must leave all their loved ones in another part of this world.

They are technicians who have a job to do. The planned work and scientific studies need to be completed in chronological order. In our daily routine, they rarely intervene. Their programs are long-term.

Once the goals have been determined, they will not change for thousands of years, and this indicates that they have a firm policy in their world or country of origin. 

Adherence to long-term policies can be challenging for many of their people to bear. It can be both cruel, with only brutal repression and domination at the forefront, but sticking to a strategy can also be purely economic trading. 

Strategies that are pursued over many years grow out of strict self-discipline. Due to their extensive knowledge of life's processes, they do not let themselves be influenced by short-term fluctuations and simply ignore them. 

Their in-depth knowledge of the universe allows these beings to focus their thoughts on scientific goals without being distracted by short-term temperamental emotions. 

The goal they strive for is the growth and expansion of their influence throughout the universe. They want to achieve this through silent intervention that is not perceived but is applied continuously in different peoples. 

One thing is sure: they are not monsters, although they can have different manifestations. The fear of them, especially of their appearance as known through many films, is unfounded. But to be afraid, you only have to lift the carpet and look under the microscope at what is going on here. 

Space travelers are intelligent beings, at the moment more advanced than ourselves.

We are always shown pictures of extraterrestrials in which they appear as monsters.

The mere thought of these creatures should frighten us. Of course, these ever-repeating films of man-eating monsters influence people's imagination.

The intention is to redirect interest away from the techniques they master toward imaginative creatures.

One thinks only about the horrible appearance and not about the fascinating technology.  The mind and society as a whole are not capable of importing technology.

One sticks to the application of known, often not yet fully developed technology, especially in order not to interrupt the creation of value. New technology usually has different owners, and the profits made from it as well.

For this simple reason, new and better technology is kept secret, suppressed, or banned. Using modern technology is like worshiping new gods. Both cause shifts in power. Therefore, any change becomes demonized. 

To prevent these changes—not only in religions—one uses threats of punishment anchored in deep psychology, but also the economy. 

Imagine a person who lets himself predict what tomorrow will bring. By all appearances, the near future comes predicted as dangerous, and there are good reasons to take care of yourself more than usual.

Such an announcement is enough to alarm the subconscious, and it is not uncommon for statements of this kind to cause something to happen to the person concerned. Bio-feedback is a force that develops unconsciously but affects the organism. After a negative announcement, the result can be catastrophic; after a pleasant publication, the day will also be satisfying. It is the same concerning meeting beings from another world. But what effect would the massive presence of these beings and their machines have in a society that acts against God's commandments every day anyway?

Where murder and robbery are part of the daily news?

Where peoples join together in military alliances and invade other countries out of greed and lust for power?

Everything gets destroyed to take possession of any goods by force. 

A thief does not know the value of stolen goods. He demolishes doors and windows, cupboards, and much more. He even brutally extinguishes human lives to get at an object of his greed. The conscience of lawless robbers is numb. Not to mention the rules of coexistence and law enforcement, as well as respecting the law. 

But many people also consider gifts of objects to be worthless. The time and diligence they contain are not recognizable to them.

If you give something of great value to a person, they cannot appreciate it as much as you do. Because they cannot feel how much sweat and effort it took to earn it with hard work.

The recognition of other inhabited worlds with technology we can only dream of would deprive many institutions of their livelihood. So this must not happen.

There is strong opposition to this. 

We always get more information about the existence of probably habitable exoplanets. But our doubts will continue to outweigh any certainties until we encounter the inhabitants of these worlds. It is not enough that individuals speak of having seen aliens. No, every human being wants to witness such an encounter in person. 

Only if a serious institution like NASA were to show an authentic pictorial document of them in space or from their homeland could initial belief become a certainty. If we manage to take this step toward you alone, we will be ready to live with them. Your presence here shows us that there is a way to them.

They have already mastered this way to us on Earth.

Greetings Josef Bauer


Read rest of entry

Sunday, August 9, 2009

Apollo 15 and the Truth of Hadley Rille



Report: #0039



Apollo 15, on July 31, 1971, took a stroll to our Moon and landed on a landscape pre-selected for its beauty, for its picturesque setting.

 

Isn't that a charming, romantic argument? NASA, 38 years ago, had the money and serenity to wander the allure of a place out there on the Moon. We have plenty of beautiful spots right here on Earth. With a horse, you can reach stunning rural areas. With a bike, you can enjoy moderately rugged paths, and walking lets you even climb mountains. 

No, the goal was the Moon. But why don't they venture farther now? Isn't it as enchanting as before? Did they find too much dust?

Ironically, I'm just repeating the written description and explanation of why they landed precisely there—at the foot of some mountains, where a long, deep trench known as Hadley Rille passes by.


It does have exotic beauty. But NASA doesn't make space trips for such reasons. We don't know why they conducted so many flights, nor why they suddenly stopped. It had become routine; there were no major complications in the later missions.

NASA didn't lack money then—and doesn't now. 

How did NASA choose a landing site? Surely, it had to be flat, without many rocks or drops in the terrain. Among the countless craters, there always seems to be enough space for a safe landing. No mountains, no rivers, no seas.

The decisions made are secret, just like the results of the trips.  Well, today I'll talk about one place in two versions. I'll show it in images and describe what I see. I won't repeat anything. I just see the same place from different angles.

Possibly, we'll find nothing abnormal. We'll see how easy it is to fool our eyes—and how, with a different interpretation or presentation of images, we see totally opposite things. You might tell me that's just happening to me, not to you. You could interpret an image from the Apollo 15 team more easily and accurately.

When I finish this report, I'll still have my doubts. If anyone wants to discuss it with me afterward—or among yourselves—there's space for comments.

Let's start.  Just recently—barely a year ago—SELENE, the Japanese JAXA satellite, captured images of the Apollo 15 landing site.

Once again, the trench—Hadley Rille—is clearly visible, running almost in a circle around a spot.



Near some mountains, passing through various craters without entering them. This trench is 80 km long and 300 meters deep. To study the origin of this unique lunar landscape, the best astronauts of the time traveled there.

They brought rocks from this place back to Earth. Its origin dates back to the beginnings of this orbiting body, wherever it was at that time. Because some say the Moon is older than Earth. So, our Moon is a wandering loner from some remote corner of our solar system, captured in its moment by Earth. It wasn't love; it was a abduction by our mother Earth so that, in a distant future, this Moon could serve us as a companion on nights of love.  I've often wondered why the sky is so dark in all these images. Until today, I don't know, but it always seems suspicious to me. The images look very similar in every mission. Could someone be darkening, changing the color, or directly inverting the images, presenting us with the negatives of the photos?

A mountain can become a crater, and a crater can turn into a mountain. That's what seems to have happened here, in that image of Hadley Rille. 


 

First, I'll show you this image, and parts of these images in false color, inverted—that is, the negative of an original image.

 

Only then do the depths of the trench become visible.

The shadow transforms into a lava river or a dry river that, billions of years ago (3.4 billion), had hot lava instead of water in its depths.

 

It's highly credible, and I don't doubt this confirmation. All celestial bodies were, at their beginning, a hot ball—almost like a paste or boiling soup. But what about my eyes? Why can't I recognize the depth of this trench in the original?

 

Something totally different appears to me. On the contrary, I no longer see depths but heights—constructions as if from concrete.



They look like entrances to underground stations. Gates well hidden, adapted to their surroundings. The shadows no longer match the stones and rocks.

 

The original doesn't reflect the official description but shows entrances to deep underground stations on the Moon. You'll tell me that doesn't exist.

 

Well, I understand: They're not entrances, not gates. But please, put a sign in front of each gate saying: "Entry is not prohibited; there simply is no entry."

In the inverted image—not the original—please put a sign: "Swimming prohibited, because it's hot lava running there, not water."  Is everything clear? It's not a concrete gate; it's a deep trench!  


As I said at the beginning, I'm more confused than before. I just know that NASA was in a hurry to arrive right there, near the entrance. Or was it not an entrance—and they didn't have an encounter down there with someone? 

Josef Bauer


Credit:NASA/APOLLO-15/AS15-87-11716HR


Read rest of entry

Friday, July 10, 2009

Crop Circles: Works of Art, But Not from UFOs

 

Report: #0037


The circles drawn in wheat fields are works of art, but not works of UFOs.

Here, I show you a drawing of a jellyfish, recently etched in a wheat field.

 

Reported and presented by the Telegraph.co.uk:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/5427512/600ft-jellyfish-crop-circle-found-in-Oxfordshire-field.html  Exquisite—the drawing itself, the motif.  What are the "drawn circles" in wheat fields?

Flattenings of growing wheat plants in their vital, still-growing state. Mature, dry wheat won't do for the drawing.

If you step on a fresh plant, it crushes more easily than a dry, rigid one.

The drawing becomes more defined, the lines more precise. Mature wheat doesn't reflect the design as sharply due to its uniform color. In contrast, green, fresh, growing wheat rises a little again—and even produces grains the producer can harvest; thus, the economic damage isn't so great.

The green of the plant shines more in the sun than dry wheat.  Crop circle drawings in wheat fields are expressions of art in perfection. Beyond their creation on a computer, they carry adrenaline and the anticipation of wide media distribution.  A work of art is always more than the observed drawing alone.

It's the summary of an artistic process.


 

The summary of professional work, from virtual creation to the real materialization of an abstract idea.  Source: Crop Circle photos and reports courtesy The Crop Circle Connector (cropcircleconnector.com).

All images and text are Copyright © 1995-2009 on the Crop Circle Connector @ http://www.cropcircleconnector.com/. Information compiled by M J Fussell and Stuart Dike.  What does an artist use?

Colors and plastic materials.

Do we have that in these field drawings?

Of course. A plant, though green, has dozens of colors. The green color in nature expresses itself in at least forty subtle variations. With every breeze and sunlight reflection, it shifts from nearly transparent green to almost black.

It's beautiful to watch a wheat field move like a carpet.

Even more so when the ears emerge from their nest, their sheath among the leaves that protected them in formation.  The plastic material is the wheat, the plant. The most natural thing an artist can find for their work.

Some—or rather, many—religious Asian artists used and use tree plants to shape them over years of care and slow growth, because they are trees and not annual grasses.

Observing a plant and cultivating it in a pre-chosen, predestined place for a purpose—whether to provide shade, fruits, or harmony with flower colors to a spot.

The material of a plant, bonsai treelets mixed with a stone environment and some water source, is Zen practice. Harmony is expressed in perfection through that.

 



 http://www.acer-asoc.com/duran/bonsais.htm

There are artists with the need to propagate their work to be known and thus sell better. Others materialize works from the simple desire in their heart. Drawing is like singing, just in another frequency. The melody can be the same.

I'm sure these field-drawing artists are a mix of several forms of expression.

Because of their talent, they have to create art.

That comes from an inner impulse and cannot be stopped. The other aspect is ego: the desire to show one's artistic capabilities. There's nothing wrong with that. It would be a poor world without art.  

 
 
All images and text are Copyright (c) 1995-2009 on the Crop Circle Connector
@ http://www.cropcircleconnector.com/ Information Compiled by M J Fussell and Stuart Dike.
Fuente:"Crop Circle photos and reports courtesy The Crop Circle Connector
(cropcircleconnector.com)".

The dilemma these artists face is that with the art materials they use, they damage the owner of the agricultural production. It's like causing an accident and fleeing the scene without giving identification. It's a schizophrenic mix between the generous artist who gives us their work but escapes responsibility for paying for the damage done. The viewpoint of the field owners is never discussed. I'm an agronomist; I know how annoying it is if a stray cow enters a wheat field—or worse, if a car or tractor enters a crop field to detour around a water hole on the road where it might get stuck. Sometimes a truck gets stuck on the road, blocking vehicles, and they in turn choose the detour through the field to avoid waiting until the truck is freed. It always hurt me to lose a wheat plant, but it was always many square meters lost. The artist should make economic agreements with the owner and sell the images to journalists.

But there he has another dilemma.

Who will look at these drawings if they're not made by gods with their sky ships?  I don't say UFOs don't exist; on the contrary, I'm convinced of their existence. But they are not the authors of these artistic drawings.

A dilemma for the artist, my confirmation. I don't want them to stop, but yes, to do it during the day and with the owner's permission.

The propaganda will no longer come from UFOs but from the material creator's ability in the drawings.

Like any other artist, they must sell their recognized and acquired works for their artistic value, not false propaganda. It's not fair to other artists who don't use this false propaganda.  Finally, the field crop drawers are very good artists, and that's why they don't need false propaganda. We can give them public recognition and legal protection—as long as there are economic agreements for both parties involved: the owner and the artist.

Because they are great artists—no one disputes that. 

Josef Bauer 

Greetings Josef Bauer

Clarification: For the presentation of crop circle images, there is permission for personal and non-commercial use:

Individuals may download, reproduce, and use images and associated captions posted on The Crop Circle Connector's website for their own personal use.


The copyright appearing on a photo may not be removed by any means, including photo-manipulation software of any kind. Express permission for such use is not required. If the downloaded photos are made available to others, and we encourage you to do so as long as no fee is obtained for your doing so, the following credit line is requested on EACH page: "Crop Circle photos and reports courtesy The Crop Circle Connector (cropcircleconnector.com)".
Read rest of entry

Monday, July 6, 2009

The Green Emerald





Report: #0036


The image – like others I will show – is a UFO, but transformed to its original color. It's a new form of digital art. I call it OVNI-Digiart.

The motif of the image is a mystery. In this series of images, presented for the first time on my blog, I don't want to discuss the technical aspects, nor the origin or who they are.

Nor what it is – rather, I took the photos I myself managed to capture during astonishing sightings and transformed them: the background color, the relief structure, and other elements. The original core is always preserved, and that core is a flying object that appeared before my eyes. I can't identify them, so they are cataloged as UFOs or OVNIs. That's art of the mystery. Enjoy the beauty with a strange origin.  Josef Bauer





Read rest of entry

Friday, June 26, 2009

Michael Jackson said:”Remember the time.”


 


Report: #0035

Reflection: 004.
Michael Jackson, you said:”Remember the time.”
Now, the time will remember you
The King of Pop is gone, but we all will remember you of the rest of our life.


 
 


Michael Jackson, the King of Pop, has left us.

The void left by Michael Jackson is enormous.

With him, an era of glory has come to an end. The world was different then. It was full of optimism. Then Michael Jackson arrived with his rhythm and new technology never seen before.

His special shows seemed to come from the future. He had the most expensive and modern technology and the most beautiful and talented people at his disposal.

He turned his artistic ideas and fantasies into music, dance, and fantastic effects never seen before. What's more, no one else was capable of combining all of that in a single show. Only he could do it, because the rhythm of his music and his dancing came from his soul.

We have his music on all storage media, but we will never again see his angelic face, his pained soul, which could be seen in his eyes, his dances, and his live songs.

May he rest in peace.

Good by Michael Jackson
my condolence to his familys
Greet´s Josef Bauer

Read rest of entry

Thursday, June 25, 2009

A Crater on Mars That Isn't a Crater

 ojovivo_4a_thumb

Report: #0034

 Report:031.


A crater on Mars that doesn't originate from a meteor impact – nor does it seem volcanic.



For it to be a volcanic crater, it's missing more mass in the walls. The walls are very thin and regular in all directions. A volcanic eruption opens the crater, expels some material that plugs the vent, and the lava flows outward and cools, leaving the edges progressively higher. Always, some lava flow heads to the volcano's lower spots. An eruption can last hours, days, weeks, or even years.

We have images from other moons in our solar system where an eruption lasts years.  What I'm getting at is that a lava flow heads downward and doesn't consider – if it even has one – the symmetry often characteristic of the crater itself. A volcanic crater has a concave shape, with a much smaller diameter in the center than at the rim.  



Always, on one side, there's an avalanche of hardened lava, layer upon layer. Kilometers from the center, this hot mass flows and leaves a mark of its path for eternity.
  In our image, it's the opposite.

The crater isn't the result of a meteor impact either – as I've shown in some cases and as seen in Moon images. An impact normally cleans the entire interior of a crater, hurling, vaporizing, or burning everything in its path

ojovivo_4_thumb3


Normally, it doesn't have a rim above ground level; it's simply a pit, according to the meteor's volume.  This image shows a rim rising significantly above the Mars ground level. This means it's not an impact.

So, the wall must have formed from an eruption from inside. As I explained earlier, a volcanic crater is concave from inside out.  Here, we see something strange. The diameter at the top rim is smaller than inside, narrowing like an eye: round, slender, elegant, symmetrical. The outer wall is also highly symmetrical, round, and beautiful.  Looking from above toward the center of this crater – I have no other word to describe it, though it doesn't seem the product of an eruption – something or someone inside is visible.


It doesn't look like remnants of cooled lava to me. It looks like someone or something hidden there.  As in many images, I can't give definitive explanations. I believe in the future, we'll need in-situ geologists to determine so many geological forms and new elements. Possibly, in many cases, a biologist too for answers on the possibility of different life forms.

To me, this eye on Mars's ground is a hiding spot, a nest, a home for a form of life on Mars.  

 
 Josef Bauer

credit:Nasa/Mars Global Surveyor - Mars Orbiter Camera S1000780

Read rest of entry

Monday, June 22, 2009

The Best Evidence of Liquid Water and Life on Mars

biolifeinlake_2a_thumb

Report: #0033


 In the HiRISE image "ESP_012873_1075_RED.abrowse," I found – and I say this with absolute certainty – once again, evidence of liquid water and biological life on Mars.

Rarely in my blog do I express myself with such vehemence and certainty as today in publishing these irrevocable evidences of life on Mars.  I thought long and hard before publishing this evidence of life on Mars. Now, I place myself in line—or perhaps alongside—other more well-known researchers, like Mr. Joseph P. Skipper http://www.marsanomalyresearch.com/ or the discoverer of the Face on Mars, Mr. Richard C. Hoagland. 


  biolifeinlake_0_thumb1

I also expose myself to attacks from opponents of extraterrestrial life, wherever it may be and in whatever form.

History shows that all these researchers who managed to discover true evidence of UFOs, extraterrestrial lives, or contact with them – today or throughout history – of impossible artifacts and many other such secret facts and things, were persecuted or slandered in their personal and professional honor and credibility.

It's no small risk to deliver to public opinion clear and indisputable evidence of secret things, facts hidden for so many thousands of years from the public.

But moreover, the more people have it on their computers, the less danger there is for the evidences themselves to be lost once more. One person, sometimes as a bearer of knowledge, is no longer so important when they share their discoveries with others. The internet, in this sense, has an uncontrollable force for governments or hidden power groups.  Now, to the photos – which are a true surprise.  

biolifeinlake_1_thumb1

 In the middle of this image, a lake with liquid water and a colony of a new form of life is visible.  
 
biolifeinlake_2_thumb1

I've already found many forms of life that I haven't published yet, for the reasons mentioned above. But this form is special. It lives in a lake that, in turn, may be a bit frozen on the surface – but not so much that the roots or other organs of this biological form cannot reach the vital liquid. 

 
biolifeinlake_3_thumb1

These circles have a small bright bulge in their center, which could be the head or brain of each individual. It's a colony of several, but countable, individuals.  


biolifeinlake_4_thumb1

 I will study this image more deeply, and in future installments, I'll present expansions of this report.

I give you the image number so you can investigate on your own.

If you copy my images or the text from my report, please include the link to my blog. That way, more and more people can become aware. 

Josef Bauer


Read rest of entry

Sunday, June 21, 2009

NASA Orbiter to Bomb the Moon

NASA LCROSS k

Report: #0032




NASA is going to the Moon. That's good.

NASA is going to the Moon to bomb it. That's bad.  A very interesting report on this website:



...discusses the next step NASA plans for the lunar surface: searching for water on the Moon.

NASa LCROSS a

NASA can observe stars in other galaxies and determine if hydrogen exists in them or on some exoplanets.

Yet on our Moon, they need to detonate one or two bombs to turn this explosion into a data stream that might reveal water molecules. I've read the full report, and without accepting all the UFO theories, I want to make a comment. In a nutshell, here's what I think:  Phoenix, the Mars lander that touched down on ice, had six high-tech ovens to vaporize samples of that ice. With its scoop, it collected soil, placed it at the oven doors, and ran the tests. The ovens heated up, and sensors analyzed the vapor for hydrogen – but unfortunately, they didn't reach a clear conclusion. To this day, we don't know exactly what those tests yielded. Was there water or not? Landing on snow and ice, photographing drizzles and strong winds, and they couldn't confirm water on Mars.  Now, the new method is brute force. Why not use neurons instead of ballistic missiles?

The U.S. political leaders are an embarrassment to the world. They have scientists doing excellent work, developing energy-efficient cars – but corrupt politicians won't allow it.

A good politician could resolve the world's problems through agreements, respecting different religions and people's thoughts. However, luck and peace seem to have to be delivered – or sent – with rockets and warplanes to distant countries.  Now, we're going to bomb the Moon. Scientifically, this is a regression of thousands of years. It's not humanity's future; the future is science without politics or wars.

If NASA can't get accurate data by heating ice to turn it into water, they'll never get it with missiles or rockets.

Moreover, this is a declaration of war on a world that doesn't belong to us. It's a crime and a foolish act. 

Josef Bauer


Read rest of entry
 

Kontakt: Josef Bauer

Followers

Time

Mars and UFOs Mysteries Copyright © 2009 Black Nero is Designed by Ipietoon Sponsored by Online Business Journal