¡The Problem Is Not the Bomb, But the Approach!

Reflection: #033

The lunar satellite, called LCROSS, and its Centaur rocket shook the Moon's surface near the south pole in search of water ice.  

Here we see the target, the place where the bomb's impact was pre-programmed.

This image shows the flash at the moment of the explosion.

This white point is the main explosion. There is no clarity about this other bright point, which seems farther away but in the same crater.

An ultraviolet photograph shows the bright flash point. The explosion of the first bomb on the Moon. 

 

NASA succeeded, but humanity showed its aggressive character with this.

The approach, however, is wrong. This is the problem of politics, of the general thinking of the major national associations of the world—the USA.  The United States is very advanced technologically. Many inventions are included in a space program. Cutting-edge technology seems capable of solving all of science's problems.

The bomb is not the problem; the strategy is! 

The bomb is not the problem, the goal orientation, how to be a problem solves, that is the problem! This is the weak point.

Now let's see how this thinking works, like a company analysis.

A good manager of a company must have an image of the company's balance sheet. An image of the current state of the accounts. It is also necessary to create an abstract image of the company with optimal data—the state of the company where all factors are optimal. Minimum costs, high turnover, and other factors—like the best personnel and the best machines—reflect an exemplary company.

Now, compare the two results: the real state and the abstract state that can be achieved. In an analysis, you can see how far the company is from a good result. Logically, all points that are not yet optimal must be polished to achieve the best results. It is a constant act of leveling the functioning of a company.  

The goals of politics are seen differently. 

The goal is not balance or the efficiency of a country. 

Military potential is the goal. Brutal force sustains many countries, even though they are far from a balanced system, from an optimal state. Strict regulation, the use of force with war weapons, keeps many countries standing, even if they are economically and morally bankrupt.  

The politics of the USA has never strived for economic balance, much less moral balance. Even less in military terms—it took the lead in the insane spending on military equipment and its use, undoubtedly immoral. It has never thought of a global solution to problems without the use of force. 

Here, I would like to include the following question: What problems have been solved in the last hundred years? 

The rights to use oil wells have been and remain the main problems.

Contrary to all logic of the limits of possible income for a state—or confederation of states through taxes—problems and conflict points are caused worldwide. These, in turn, are resolved militarily with insane financial means that are actually not available.

Then comes the one who has instigated and caused the problems and offers solutions to these caused problems. The idea of how to solve the problem always comes from the entrepreneurs, not from good technicians or administrators or religious leaders.  The traffickers of money and arms direct world politics.

Money is a market product, not a means of payment!

Weapons are intended to make people or entire nations obey. 

They are used to destroy humanity, not for world welfare.  

So the approach to using the great human capital, the intelligence of scientists, the money of workers is wrong. Everything is resolved with violence and money. This crude theory causes more wars, more problems, more pain, and more hatred.  

A bomb was carried by a space rocket to a space body that belongs neither to us nor to any nation and detonated on its surface.

The Moon orbiting our home planet was attacked—coincidentally on the day the President of the United States received the Nobel Peace Prize.  I congratulate the gentleman on the one hand, but I also hope he changes the approach of his viewpoint—for example, by using human intelligence.

The explosion of a bomb, a bubble (in the stock market, where many people also suffer) here on Earth, or worse still on another planet or moon, can never bring positive results.  

Administrative principles, moral principles—not military tactics—must be the orientation of humanity and especially of the leading countries of this Earth. In the end, there will be positive results for humanity.  

It is time for the USA and humanity in general to analyze both sides of the balance sheet: The current state of humanity and the abstract state in which we should be. 

Are we where we want to be? I doubt it!  Josef Bauer

Josef Bauer