Mars and UFOs Mysteries: Phoenix Landed: A NASA Satellite on Mars

Report: #0106

As you know, Phoenix—a NASA satellite—landed on Mars, and like many people, I'm interested in this topic.

In the analysis of the first photos, I first found something that is possibly the Phoenix parachute.

Only two days later, NASA acts and publishes a report with two photos, clarifying the matter—as I had asked them to do. But those are big words from me, because they will never pay attention to me if they don't want to comment. Now, it suits them to show Phoenix hanging from its parachute, flying toward the Mars surface.

Now, it suits them to show Phoenix at its landing site. Good. The more images we receive, the better.

The interesting thing is that the camera is on the Mars Orbiter satellite, at a distance of 760 km.

The parachute is 10 meters in diameter. I don't know the size of Phoenix at this moment, but with its circular solar cells and all the electronic equipment placed on top of the Phoenix Mars Lander, it acts like a large mirror and reflects large and bright beams of sunlight and sky above it.

Thus, it's easy to locate it among the rocks with a color much brighter than the dark ground.

As I already showed in the first report—and published, I believe, as a world premiere—something strange, something artificial in the vicinity of the landing site. It's like a transmission tower placed on the ground of Mars, as if CNN or BBC were already waiting for its arrival.

It's not the first time BBC arrives first to unique event places (WTC-7). Now, it places its three legs on the Mars ground. Technologically, an immense achievement. But it's hard to believe it really worked. If one of those legs had touched a half-meter-high rock, it would have tipped over. It found no obstacle in its Russian roulette landing. How many places full of rocks, full of ice, full of craters and geological faults.

What technology does NASA have that they don't tell us about? If they can take such precise images to locate a place without obstacles, why don't they show us photos with that resolution too? And how can they make an unmanned satellite descend to a predetermined spot of a few square meters on a planet that rotates and moves?

What Martian GPS technology are they using?

Are there already more satellites in orbit that we don't know about? And if they don't have a GPS, how can they risk exposing so much money to such high risk? Many questions that are also—or more important—than the question of whether there is life on Mars.

NASA sends its first images in black and white. In the year 2008! Every cell phone has better resolution. Now came an image of a spot of ice down below, next to Phoenix. It's impossible to determine at a glance what it's about. The image has no color. When enlarged to 200 percent—that is, a simple doubling enlargement—sharpness is already lost.

What camera does the Phoenix robotic arm work with? With 2 megapixels, it should come out much better. I assume they are interested in the sharpness of the images and would equip it with the latest technology.

I repeat: The Orbiter takes photos of an object in motion (in vertical descent) from a distance of 760 kilometers, and the arm placed on Phoenix, at a height of half a meter—that is, from under the landed Phoenix—does not send images with extremely high resolution.

Something doesn't match! Everything seems staged, selected, and censored. One image seems to have no anomaly and is better. In another place, there are more curious things, and unfortunately, at a distance of ten or twenty meters, you can no longer enlarge the image.

They take the time to manually glance or with programs for a pre-selection that doesn't give information to the public.

Why does the public, the people of the United States, allow this deception?

Is it a military matter? But the army is also for and by the people, not against them.

Or are we in different places?

There, the army with its power, and here the common man?

Are we already fighting different battles, different wars in places unreachable by the common man? Are there battles in space or for space? Phoenix already has its wings deployed with the solar cells.

Here, a transmission tower is seen. NASA says, after two days of silence, that it's a parachute.

Image from the Orbiter with embedded enlarged images.

For comparison, I embedded an image of Phoenix of the same white object standing at a distance of one or two kilometers. Normally, a parachute stays like fabric on the ground and not upright meters in the air.